01:55:00 pinging rehrar 01:55:20 This MR to remove analytics JS from CCS has been open for a couple of weeks with no activity: https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-front/-/merge_requests/31 01:55:57 Additional review/comments welcome 01:56:14 Apparently the JS code is nonfunctional anyway, but might as well be rid of it 02:14:39 sethsimmons hey :), the mempool is similar to moneroblocks.info right (but graphical)? 02:18:55 Yeah, it’s essentially a block explorer that focuses on the mempool/fee market 02:19:19 But still let’s you view blocks, transactions, addresses etc 02:20:39 Play around with mempool.space to get a feel for it, it’s awesome 😎 02:21:28 Would be great to include Monero’s dynamic block sizes 02:26:27 Hi 02:26:48 I'm sorry sarang. I'm super focused on Defcon. Will get to that soon. 02:29:07 No worries rehrar! The `monero-site` equivalent got merged, and I wanted to make sure the `ccs-front` one didn't get lost somewhere :) 02:29:49 Also noticed a `manifest.json` file request in my browser dev console that returned `404`... not sure if that's some weird client-side thing, or an actual bad request 02:32:15 Any idea on that? 02:32:31 (favicons also don't exist FWIW, but I know that's a browser-initiated request usually) 15:50:46 ok meeting here in a bit yeah? 15:50:51 I'm running. sgp_ is away. 15:51:32 the 🐭 will play 16:06:00 I’ll probably miss sadly 16:06:04 How long till meeting? 16:06:06 .time 16:06:06 2020-08-01 - 16:06:06 16:06:10 umm 16:06:13 now I guess :P 16:06:14 sorry 16:06:40 oh no 16:06:43 it's in one hour 16:07:08 Sweet might make it then haha 16:59:45 Ok. 16:59:48 Meeting time. 17:00:02 1. Greetings 17:00:08 Who all is here? 17:00:38 Oh oh, me 17:01:11 -xmr-pr- [meta] michaesc opened issue #495: Monero Village Meeting: 1 August 2020, 18:00 UTC 17:01:11 -xmr-pr- > https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/495 17:02:06 ✋ 17:03:02 Small crowd today? 17:03:21 So it would seem 17:03:23 🍿 17:03:47 they are just shy 17:03:49 That's ok. 17:03:54 2. Community highlights. 17:04:01 Read the Revuo (If I would ever put it out anyways) 17:04:37 But is there anything of note that anyone would like to share? 17:04:45 Sure 17:04:56 Long story short, now proceding to move forward w/ creating MoneroCommunity Mastodon/Pleroma (think Twitter, but FOSS and federated over ActivityPub protocol) instance. 17:05:25 Had been mulling finding a good way to mirror the Twitter account into fediverse over the last two years to build presence. 17:05:28 However a lot of instances aren't 'retweet' bot friendly. Then the Twitter hack happened last month and decided there really needed to be a fall back that we controlled. 17:05:31 Still in the process of working out some technical particulars w/ help from the hacking community, but I'm aiming to have the VPS company and servers be Switzerland based to try and protect users at least legally. Announcements will be PGP signed, etc etc. 17:05:35 Rules will basically be the MoneroCommunuty CoC 17:05:41 Currently preoccupied w/ DEF CON / hacker summercamp related stuff, but hopefully should be up and running in the next 1.5-2 months. Would love volunteer moderators. The end. 17:08:16 Neato 17:08:22 Anyone else? 17:08:25 is there an official monero mastodon account on any of the servers? 17:08:54 I own the Monero account on both mastodon.social and .tech, and maybe one or two instances 17:08:54 not sure what thats called in mastodon. 17:09:10 Was manually trying to mirror Twitter, but that became too time consuming for my tastes 17:09:28 Will have them repoint to the MoneroCommunity instance when it's set up 17:10:15 Hi 17:10:28 Hello. Sorry, i'm late 17:11:17 3. CCS updates? 17:11:46 Thoughts on xiphon? https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/merge_requests/157 17:11:54 Yay? Nay? 17:11:59 yeah 17:12:00 Yay, obiviously 17:12:32 Seems obvious. 17:12:38 What about this one? https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/merge_requests/156 17:13:30 From what i've seen from the MRL channels, the implementation of b+ is still being discussed 17:14:24 If Sarang et MRL is on board, I'd be onboard 17:16:41 Sarang are you here? 17:16:48 If not we can move on. 17:16:59 https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/merge_requests/154 17:17:09 Russian video guy. 17:17:15 He's done many before. 17:18:26 Sure, why not, proven regulatr 17:19:04 https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/merge_requests/147 17:19:14 This? Let's make a recommendation to core. 17:19:19 Swedish translation. 17:19:23 ErCiccione: ? 17:21:05 We already discussed it some time ago. Don't know why it's still there. The translation of the CLI is literally the last thing i care about 17:21:25 who opened that proposal? cannot open the link right now 17:22:00 pricode 17:22:43 Yeah it opened now. I don't remember if they contacted me in past. I would suggest them to work on literally anything else. I will leave a comment there, i thought i already did 17:22:47 Ok. Will recommend to close then? 17:22:53 rehrar: I am here! 17:22:56 Not sure if it's a request for payment or just a request for swedish being added in Weblate for CLI 17:23:13 Sarang comment on that? 17:23:24 Sorry, catching up... BP+? 17:23:28 https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/merge_requests/156 17:23:32 Yes 17:23:42 Sure, I can address that 17:23:56 I've been discussing it with the CCS proposers, who have a lot of expertise on the construction 17:24:06 rehrar: I wouldn't fund it, yeah. Probably better to leave a comment first, suggesting them to work on something else. The entire website has been translated for example, but we need a reviewer 17:24:14 It's just your thoughts. Did this guy open a Reddit thread for discussion? 17:24:19 The verification numbers in their table are not representative of a Monero implementation, since their BP numbers did not use some of the optimizations we did 17:24:38 Verification will be marginally faster, but likely on the order of 1-2% or so 17:25:02 Size benefits are present: 96 bytes per transaction, regardless of the number of outputs (but still subject to consensus rules) 17:25:36 The risks are that it's critical consensus code, that it is extremely new with not many eyes on it yet, etc. 17:26:02 One option is to have the proposers do an audit of any implementation, since they have experience with this 17:26:14 They would not write the implementation and audit it, of course 17:26:42 So the question is whether or not the size benefits are considered worth the cost and risks 17:26:54 I mentioned in #mrl before that I'd be kind of hesitant to touch sensitive crypto code for mere size optimizations 17:27:16 Especially considering we have a proper pruning implementation 17:27:19 Of course, it's not like the math expires... it's certainly possible to wait until the construction receives more examination 17:28:45 Bitcoin basically almost suffered an inflation bug due to some minor verification improvements that touched sensitive code 17:29:33 Ok 17:29:36 What about this? 17:29:38 https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/merge_requests/138 17:29:52 Are you asking me rehrar? 17:30:36 I don't know enough about what the proposer is looking to do, so I don't have an informed opinion 17:32:23 Everyone 17:32:26 Regarding BP+, my opinion right now is to continue investigation and prototyping, but not to rush into it 17:32:30 We can table for now. 17:32:34 Ok. Thanks sarang 17:32:52 4. Workgroup reports 17:32:53 Should it be decided to move forward, the CCS proposers would be a great resource 17:32:57 * sarang is done now! 17:33:17 Daemon/CLI/GUI workgroup 17:33:55 Selsta dEBRUYNE ? 17:34:48 Not much to report, only that there will be a 0.16.0.3 release soon 17:35:00 Soon. 17:35:01 Ok. 17:35:08 b. Localization workgroup 17:36:12 dEBRUYNE: is 0.16.0.3 ledger stuffs or? 17:36:19 Things are in progress. Nothing really major to report. We still need asap a reviewer for swedish 17:36:41 the core of the website is complete, but we cannot merge until somebody review the translations 17:37:47 c. Website 17:37:51 Speaking of ^ 17:40:00 The website got a lot of optimizations, speedups and general updates lately 17:40:13 my usual update here: https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/i0mpk2/getmoneroorg_updated_massive_performance/ 17:40:14 [REDDIT] GetMonero.org updated: Massive performance improvements, greatly improved SEO, new "Blog" menu, removed all javascript and more! (self.Monero) | 78 points (96.0%) | 7 comments | Posted by ErCiccione | Created at 2020-07-30 - 14:11:13 17:40:30 a lot of stuff got merged right after so my next update will be probably quite big 17:40:35 d. Outreach 17:40:43 Sorry to zoom through these. Defcon meeting soon. 17:41:39 e. Monero Research Lab 17:41:42 Sarang 17:41:49 The CLSAG audit is complete 17:42:07 Blog post and the full audit report are waiting for binaryFate to deploy the site: https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/pull/1112 17:42:15 You can still view the report there 17:42:27 I recommend waiting on any public links until the site is built 17:42:50 Otherwise, some work on BP+, other minor PRs and such 17:43:04 Cool deal. 17:43:04 The CCS for atomic swaps was also completed (not by me!) 17:43:29 5. Defcon (next week!) 17:43:45 Join us! Discord and twitch. Those links will be added to monerovillage.org very soon. 17:43:56 6. Open ideas time 17:44:05 Anyone got something they want to talk about? 17:45:16 The Revuo periodical is late. 17:45:27 so is all of defcon being live streamed? 17:45:35 I'm catching up with things starting with Defcon as the most urgent. The move I've been doing is basically complete. 17:45:39 Not all 17:45:45 Workshops for example won't be streamed 17:46:23 Maybe same for CTF and other competitive events 17:48:15 Ok. That seems to be it then. 17:48:57 Thanks for coming everyone. 17:49:05 Defcon meeting in ten or so in #monero-defcon 17:49:09 See some of you there. 17:49:11 Bai! 17:55:05 Meeting in five minutes at #monero-defcon. 17:56:00 kinghat[m]: Ledger stuffs? 17:56:20 nvm 19:49:38 Audit report is up https://web.getmonero.org/2020/07/31/clsag-audit.html 20:01:53 Typo on page 5 of the pdf "In order to good a good understanding of the scheme" 20:02:52 same page " Although we could no find flaws" 20:02:57 Did anyone proof read this? 20:48:44 Yep, thought we caught one of those 20:48:55 The other I clearly missed :/ 20:49:54 Reddit post? 20:51:12 I'll ask for a corrected version at some point if deemed necessary 21:01:46 Perhaps announce to media outlets too? 21:01:54 ^ dEBRUYNE etc 21:05:38 I’ve shared on Twitter already, but would be great to send it out through official Twitter/Reddit/media 21:05:53 Who actually runs the Monero Twitter handle? 21:06:06 Would mention them if I knew 22:37:32 Reddit post created 23:12:48 Thanks