-
gingeropolous
im aware of anaconda jwinterm
-
gingeropolous
id bet they are prolly the most popular python distribution platform for sciency stuff
-
jwinterm
PyNE not working gingeropolous :/
-
msvb-lab
sgp: The course where you will speak is sold out and looks really good, congratulations.
-
msvb-lab
I don't know UZH, but rather ETH (in Zuerich as well) which is where more hackers and network engineers (while students) hang out. Maybe UZH is more relevant for this topic however.
-
msvb-lab
How do we know what the proper 'brrrr' ending is for folks like Mr needmoney needbrrrrrrr90?
-
msvb-lab
Is there a particular number of 'r' characters that is correct and others not correct?
-
midipoet
42
-
msvb-lab
midipoet: By the way, I was slanting lines yesterday for graphic design. Do you know the angle of line that the Monero M requires? It is close to 45 degrees but not quite.
-
msvb-lab
I found that out by chance, of course as soon as I saw it was almost 45 but not quite, I knew which new value to try. And it was right.
-
midipoet
LOL
-
msvb-lab
Whoever made our logo is a total nerd.
-
lithiumpt
msvb-rtc[m] what's the angle?
-
sarang
Is it 42 degrees?
-
niocbrrrrrr
finally some good news
-
sgp_
Canada now has more competitive retail trading platform for Monero than the United States
web.newton.co/api
-
xmrmatterbridge
<cankerwort> How is this "more competitive" than Kraken etc?
-
sarang
Is the Canadian regulatory landscape much different than that of the U.S.?
-
sarang
Or is it merely perceived as such?
-
sgp_
different landscape. was more permissive, now is getting more restrictive in some ways
-
sgp_
cankerwort: no deposit or withdrawal fees
-
tevador
do we know which exchanges still use integrated addresses?
-
sgp_
tevador: good question. I'm not sure
-
sarang
sgp_: restrictive in what ways?
-
sarang
I guess what I wonder is if/how Canadian regulated entities might view interacting with privacy-focused assets versus their American counterparts
-
sarang
I know basically nothing about Canadian financial regulations
-
sgp_
for example, they want the equivalent of a SAR to be filed by next year for all crypto transfers from customers over 10k CAD
-
sarang
Is that unreasonable, given global standards today?
-
sarang
Or even, given U.S. standards today?
-
sgp_
they're earlier than other jurisdictions to clearly apply that to crypto
-
sarang
I assume that, for example, U.S. entities already have some kinds of standards for filing SARs, whether or not they interact with digital assets
-
sarang
Does the Canadian regulation simply provide a concrete number for digital assets?
-
sgp_
yeah if they started as a FI with other assets and are moving into crypto
-
sgp_
yeah I guess. they need to file now already if transactions of any amount are suspicious
-
sarang
OK, so this just provides more specific guidance than they had before?
-
sarang
(whether or not you agree that "any crypto transction over $X is automagically suspicious"...)
-
sgp_
no there's another enforcement that basically says anything 10k+ is automatically suspicious
-
sgp_
it will be a slightly different form
-
sarang
Oh, so this just puts them in line with existing regulations?
-
sgp_
yeah, similar to the treatment of cash
-
sarang
Do you think this might help regulated entities be more confident in their operations?
-
sgp_
not really since this is Canada haha
-
sarang
e.g. instead of getting out of the market, they might expand due to a better understanding of how to comply with the law
-
sarang
I mean in Canada
-
sarang
not the U.S. or elsewhere
-
sgp_
the same players will stay there afaict
-
sgp_
they already needed processes to fill out SAR-equivalents
-
sarang
On one hand, onerous regulation is onerous... but on the other hand, less uncertainty could lead to more confidence
-
xmrmatterbridge
<cankerwort> If crypto transactions have the same quantity threshold to be considered "suspicious" as cash then that's at least sane
-
msvb-web
lithiumpt sarang: I think the angle is indeed 42, but it would be good to have a second opinion. I was working quite fast and hard for certainty.