02:11:36 nice. I've been thinking about a blog post regarding our switch to a not gonna fork every 6 month thing. I was thinking about doing this as a PR to the monero meta repo. 02:12:13 does this make sense? that way ppl can edit make comments etc. though i guess it might get cumbersome if it needs to be merged before edits... well i guess it doesn't 02:23:58 i feel like we shouldnt move to that cycle when we have known protocol changes on the horizon. 02:46:40 https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Debian-Social 03:25:26 kinghat: what specific protocol changes exactly? as far as i know clsag could take up to a year more and dandelion++ doesn't need a network upgrade. 03:25:51 gingeropolous: a blog post stating we're moving to 9 months or yearly upgrades may be a good idea. 03:26:04 clsag is a year away? 03:26:48 i thought so. wasn't it going to get an audit? 03:26:57 sarang might know better than us both. 03:27:39 i mean it needs funding of an audit, ya, but it shouldnt take long from what ive heard. 03:30:08 then triptych which probably wouldnt be too far behind that. i wouldnt imagine we just sit on it to let clsag simmer. 04:40:53 cslag is waiting for some final touches before reaching out to a auditor that can audit both the math and implementation 04:41:22 and wow will have cslag live next release which is soon 04:41:38 also dandelion++ 04:42:14 wow boldly goes were no crypto has gone before 05:02:27 No meeting this Saturday 05:25:45 Hello :O 06:05:37 Yo