03:50:36 i dunno how woochat or whatever the platform is works, but i've always imagined the following ticketing system for monero 03:51:04 we create an IRC room, maybe our own IRC server. In the room, there are many idlers of the monero community that have been vetted 03:51:35 the user goes to the website, clicks on the chat thing. They get a ticket. The ticket number gets in cue. quue. whatever 03:51:58 if there are no other tickets in cue, they get directly dumped into the chatroom with all the idlers 03:52:19 the troubleshooting commences, which is probably "you should connect to a different remote node" 03:52:29 they leave the chat room. The next ticket comes in 03:53:04 maybe its more hectic that way and confusing for the user though 03:53:25 but it gets at the public nature of the support that'll keep us all on our toes without have some formal review process 03:54:01 "oh, well, i was doing my weekly reading of the logs and gingeropolous broke protocol by mentioning bananas 100x" 03:56:39 i second the sentiment of not wanting to bring up yet another channel for people to ask questions or hang. ticket systems are for companies. seems like we keep butting our heads between treating monero's ecosystem as a company vs. a community of volunteers. 03:56:50 in a general chatroom we could self moderate. 03:57:05 well thats the thing with the thing im proposing here. it introduces the user to that blatant reality 03:57:16 i mean, we all get the notion that cryptocurrencies have to exist like this 03:57:17 i'd support more strengthening the existing channels than fragmenting more and more... 03:57:19 most people dont 03:57:42 they think bitcoin is a company etc 03:58:26 we could even have the bot thats in #monero-pools that has answers to FAQs 03:58:49 99% of the noobs in there go "where are my payments, ive been mining for 10 minutes and its my money and I want it now!" 03:59:46 u used to be able to type ? payments and the bot would spit out a response 04:00:02 sgp was saying it could be hard for newcomers to find these mediums (mentioned above: reddit, stack exchange, irc channels,) i'd lean towards putting better announcements on getmonero, subreddits or social media to make them hop in here and those same mediums than creating a ticket system. the reasoning was explained previously too. 04:00:26 the bot is still there, to the best of my knowledge. 04:00:28 im saying fuse the two. i think ure missing that 04:01:12 .shrug 04:01:12 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 04:01:13 maybe i'm not in for fusing the two. it's certainly hard to tackle these issues, as we all seem to have different opinions. 04:01:59 well i basically agree. i think getting direct help via irc is the way to go. but in implementation, that usually means kiwi IRC, and the user gets dumped to a random room where they can get all sorts of experiences 04:07:59 and if theres a massive queue, a bot notifies the room and the current user and a helper break off to a private chat (if that ticket has moved to a waiting/confirmation phase, as opposed to initial troubleshooting) 04:14:33 IRC is super intimidating to newcomers 04:20:24 exactly 04:20:30 ports? PORTS?!?!?! 04:21:02 thats why u make it look like a ticketing systemj on the front end 04:21:07 and on the backend its just this 04:21:08 I really don't think recreating a support system in IRC makes sense 04:22:09 we already have a support system in IRC. it just has a shitty frontend 04:23:07 Better to shape out the other way imo 04:23:19 I can understand why IRC can be intimidating for some. How about taking the mattermost route? There's workarounds for this, perhaps. 04:23:53 The hilarious thing is mattermost is even more confusing because most content comes from IRC. 04:24:03 Mattermost has a bunch of limitations 04:24:04 There are Mattermost only rooms and IRC bridged rooms. 04:24:15 Is mattermost more user friendly than IRC clients? If IRC was not that ideal pools' administrators wouldn't put a KiwiIRC chat section on their sites, just saying. 04:24:20 And I put a pin post which explains which is which and nobody EVER reads the pinned posts. 04:24:49 Same take prevails: strengthen existing mediums. Don't keep fragmenting. I doubt there'll be much motivation from volunteers to address users' questions via ticketing systems. 04:25:09 rottensox: this is a bad argument (pools administrators). People adopt horrendous UX all the time. 04:25:21 .shrug 04:25:21 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 04:25:27 Anyone can delete channels in mattermost 04:25:41 Yeah, mattermost is pretty garbo 04:25:42 yeah and I don't think mattermost existed 6 years ago but i dunno 04:26:06 If they fixed that one flaw it would jump from a 3 to a 7 04:26:11 but id say ultimately give it a shot with the ticketing system as you're imagining it. the only to see if it works is to do it 04:26:35 and i can't code up my magical irc ticket thing so ....... 04:27:52 IRC was on one of the "things you don't see anymore on the internet from the good old days" lists. 04:28:25 Yes 04:28:33 I never used IRC before Monero 04:29:12 There was a lot of "we're still here" comments and other "lol I haven't used that in thirty years" or whatever. 04:30:33 I think anyone who thinks that sending people to IRC for help automatically should be disqualified from the conversation about how to help people. :P 04:30:55 That said, if getmonero.org or volunteers won't work, perhaps I'll just make a non-profit or something. 04:31:18 FixXMR4free.biz 04:31:27 Looks about as legit as it gets. 04:31:48 :-) 04:38:41 I was distracted playing rocket league haha, sorry for the weird responses 04:39:14 I think many people are focused so much about where the community is that they aren't focused on how people get support in the "real world" 04:39:53 yes, most people are used to messaging a company through a cat tool and having responses. while we can't emulate every aspect, I think it's worth pursuing how we can get as many of these advantages with as few disadvantages as possible 04:39:55 we have monero virus. 04:40:03 *chat tool :) 04:40:36 yet to be seen if there'll be enough active and willing volunteers to take on that responsibility. 04:40:52 agreed, it's a very big potential issue to make sure we have volunteers 04:41:12 my hope is that some clear process on how to help will help drive volunteers 04:41:49 for example, take political text volunteer systems. Let me walk you through what I did to support a particular candidate. I, a random person 04:42:19 first, I found a Slack channel on their campaign website 04:42:31 I needed to sign up for an account that had required 2fa turned on 04:42:58 then I joined a "lobby channel." I needed to read a basic intro, and I needed to report one thing I learned from a linked document 04:43:14 then I was quickly interviewed 1 on 1 with someone and moved to another chat 04:43:50 and then if I wanted to be assigned a set of messages, I commented. the first few messages I sent were manually approved by other volunteers 04:44:11 the entire time, my responses were being logged, and they would restrict my responses to one of several options 04:45:02 point is, you CAN have a volunteer-based system with randos talking to randos. It's a lot easier said than done, but I'd like to find a way to get as good of a UX as possible, and find a way to make it work, rather than the other way around 04:45:37 don't know how to answer a question? assign it to someone else, escalate, etc 04:46:08 don;t trust a user to answer appropriately? restrict their responses to several options, or require manual approval before sending the messages, etc 04:46:46 but ultimately the quality of a vetted ticket chat system users WILL be higher than the quality in an IRC chat where anyone can join 04:47:12 worried about some transparency things? fine, find a way to export and have someone review 04:47:26 add options for users to "report" things they find suspicious 04:47:58 there are a million interesting ways to help solve these challenges, and I'd much rather try something radical than some annoying IRC-based solution that no one else is doing 04:48:13 if IRC-first was the way to provide support, Apple would be doing it lol 04:48:48 there are a lot of "what ifs", for example, "what if we have lots of support requests but no volunteers to help." that's valid 04:49:03 but I don't think it's a reason to pass. The large potential demand is all the more reason to do it lol 04:49:41 I'd like to sit people down and figure out what the concerns actually are and address them in a realistic way, noting the current system is very ad-hoc 04:49:52 anyway, that's a lot of text. enough from me 04:55:26 read all but that last wall :) 04:55:32 any support system without mooo will be deficient compared to what we have now 04:55:52 nioc: sure, but 90% of questions are "how to download a wallet" 04:56:10 moo shouldn't need to waste their time handling those 04:57:09 sounds like a FAQ can handle that 04:58:04 nioc: have you seen normal users? lol 04:58:08 ideally yes 04:58:11 but they won't 04:58:45 plus having the support tool will help us know what the FAQs are 05:00:19 FA 05:00:27 ^oops, ignore 05:00:30 LA 05:00:44 FAQs help absolutely, but they're a mitigation not a comprehensive solution imo 05:10:24 ahem. lol. https://twitter.com/SallyMayweather/status/1231958946828693504 05:10:24 [ Sal the Agorist on Twitter: "… " ] - twitter.com 05:12:03 oh hey, it's mac dre 05:12:45 rottensox: what's that tweet doing here? 05:13:02 off-topic. 05:13:20 Definitely off-topic 05:13:23 @sgp_: does it have to be a realtime chat? 05:14:00 lza_menace: realtime is a goal, so whatever the best way to help get towards that goal 05:14:26 I would think a long-form style interface might be better from the aspect of vetting responses and ensuring quality 05:14:47 lza_menace: sorta like a FAQ then 05:15:03 that's already what stackexchange is for, no? 05:15:52 rehrar: you see how good the riotx android client is now? 05:16:31 eh, I guess, but no regular person is going to post there....I see the dilemma 05:17:12 basically we need a nice chat UI that has a bot that pulls possibly relevant stackexchange answers for their question haha 05:20:06 kinghat, no. Pretty good? 05:20:28 ya they are making really nice progress. with the web UI and android app. 05:20:55 switched to the desktop version of riot web as well 05:21:21 kinghat: thanks for the heads up! It was unusable 3 years ago 05:22:20 my impression now is, we dont need to or shouldnt be using irc anymore. 05:22:35 how dare. 05:23:45 kinghat[m]: does it still have rooms listed in a horizontal scroll? I can't stand that 05:24:00 theres not really a reason to anymore. matrix is decentralized/federated/encrypted. has all the new bells and whistles that the kids like. 05:24:27 iOS has horizontal scroll on channels 05:24:27 nah. 05:24:33 *still 05:24:35 sgp_: you can if you want i think. its not on by default. 05:24:41 thank god 05:24:52 at least i havent seen it. 05:27:56 I don’t like the idea of chat based support. Fosters a mentality that help must be provided ASAP and that someone should always be on the ball. Also, communicating with non-technical people via chat is awful. 05:28:10 I’d be willing to volunteer, but I’m out if it means chilling in a chat room 05:28:14 sgp_: are you on linux? 05:28:29 kinghat[m]: I joined on matrix on android 05:28:55 ya but for your desktop i mean? 05:30:10 kinghat[m]: typically I use Windows. I have a separate linux device since I hate dual-booting on Windows so much now 05:30:39 what happened with the forum idea? faded away? 05:31:06 rottensox: nope :) 05:31:22 but I'm not leading that initiative for Monero 05:32:44 ah i was going to suggest a couple things on nix. 05:33:03 need to ditch that yucky windows 05:34:14 I need to use certain apps that don't run well in Linux, so I use both 05:34:42 Luckily I have an education license so I can more aggressively tell Windows to do what I want (still no where near Linux ofc) 05:36:47 depending on the type of work, i woudl just spin windows up in a vm whenever needed but i understand that might not be practical. 05:37:08 This computer is effectively my Windows VM haha 05:37:45 Also the latest AoE2 doesn't work on Linux so 05:38:01 ah. 05:38:07 luckily i dont game 05:39:04 you like it on your android? 05:39:17 hopefully you got the riotx and not the regular version 05:45:30 kinghat[m]: yes I downloaded the beta 07:58:44 IRC has google captcha (?!) 07:58:45 IRC doesn't work well with torbrowser 07:58:46 (at least last time I had a look) 12:21:08 sounds like a FAQ can handle that >>> so we make a help bot 12:21:19 for triage 12:21:54 ah yes, that was stated 12:23:01 and it seems my point is missed re: irc with a ticket frontend. oh well. 13:12:57 If someone made a good front-end for an IRC thing maybe, but I don't see how anything in a mixed channel (where users are getting responded to among other users) is a good UX 13:31:18 sgp_, yeah my point was missed. There wouldn't be multiple endusers in there. the system would queue up users, and dump them into the channel after the previous user was done. So it would be a room with like 20 of us monterians, and then max 1 user at all times 14:01:47 why not a tool that allows any enduser to join in, but after their first question all they get are DM'd responses? 14:12:25 hyc: like what? 14:29:45 I suppose it would be a special frontend to IRC. on the enduser side, it just DMs a support ID. 14:29:59 on the monerista end, it publishes those DMs to a channel 14:30:48 and likewise, any replies from moneristas must be addressed to a specific user, so they can be DM's back 14:48:32 hyc: thanks, I think I get what you're saying now. What are the benefits of something like that? 14:51:34 that would be neat. then, the moneroistas could talk amongst themselves, then when they reach a consensus for a response, they could address the enduser. 14:52:01 so the enduser doesn't really see all the morass and hooplah of the community. though thats kinda the point maybe 14:54:31 yeah that was what I was going for 14:54:48 discuss amongst ourselves, send proper answer back 14:57:29 there would perhaps be a point person, to engage the enduser during the back and forth so the enduser feels like the support is responsive 14:57:57 and then when consensus is reached, the point person delivers the main thing 14:58:10 i bet with enough coffee i could make this happen in bash 15:19:18 as far as I understand, that's how the support system can easily work. or at the minimum there could be an IRC chat or other chat for support discussion. am I missing something? 15:19:55 has anyone here worked in IT tech support or similar answering questions? I did that for 2.5 years 15:26:01 gingeropolous is going to design the world's first IT support distributed consensus algorithm 15:41:56 gingeropolous: you would also have to design a good front-end, right? 15:44:01 cant we just do everything in the CLI? 15:44:07 ;D 16:12:32 CLI? yes, we can 16:44:26 Why don't we put the support system that we're all talking about........ 16:44:31 ......on the blockchain? 16:44:36 SupportCoin 16:44:59 hyc can innovate a brand new database and proof of support scheme. 16:45:17 gingeropolous can run supportcoinworld.com 16:45:40 sgp can lead the supportcoin community workgroup 16:52:57 nice 17:26:11 "miners" answer enduser questions, instead of solving math puzzles 17:29:32 hyc: you've solved the issue! 17:29:45 plus they're encouraged to increase adoption so more questions come in 17:59:50 On a more fun note, we should plan a gaming session tomorrow after the community meeting 18:00:20 rehrar needmonero90 luigi1111w 18:07:48 Why not today? :D sgp_ 18:08:34 what are you thinking of playing? 18:34:26 needmonero90: I already committed to playing board games with real people, but of course everyone else should take the opportunity to do something 18:36:47 Real people are still pretty underrated. I was playing Pandemic a few weeks ago. Quite amusing, given recent events. 18:38:41 I've wanted to play pandemic for ages 18:42:35 Like OG pandemic? 18:45:41 Pandemic is a good cooperative game. I think I've only played with a selected malicious player once 18:47:21 pandemic legacy 18:48:34 Yeah that's the one I was thinking of 18:49:00 Actually just kidding, not that one :p 18:49:29 I've watched people play Legacy but I haven't personally 18:52:39 here are the game I have at my place at the moment https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/oo80obWE/games.jpg 18:59:29 Wtf, no monopoly? 18:59:43 Haha nah 18:59:55 Moneropoly 19:00:21 I would need two versions, one to play (rarely) and another to keep as a collectible 19:01:13 Just contribute enough that the fact you used it is itself a piece of collectors status :D 19:03:40 Who got the edition that we (others, not you :p) played at Defcon? 19:17:03 Is it just me, or are some of those game boxes, massive? 19:25:12 sgp_: I think it was binary. 19:26:17 I liked playing moneropoly that night, though a certain someone seemed to be making up new rules. 19:26:30 /s 19:26:46 was that me? I can't recall except that I lost lol 22:14:01 If you guys really like Moneropoly, maybe I can get it to you guys mostly at cost. 22:14:10 As a thank you for good work. 22:14:14 sgp_: 22:14:31 rottensox needmonero90 22:14:59 Lol, 'good work' 22:15:01 Do you know me 22:15:26 :D 23:11:31 lol. 23:11:57 rehrar: i'd love that but i got no real friendos to play with outside of irc. 23:12:13 we should all relocate to the same town. but alas, centralization. :-D 23:18:08 I'll have a treat of extra content for you as soon as my internet/disk manages. I hope to upload about 100GB of content to the Monero Community Workgroup channel this weekend 23:18:30 o nice. 23:18:35 any hints? 23:18:53 nope :p 23:19:05 just that it's a lot of content 23:19:17 lil tease. 23:19:27 rottensox let's get someone to program the game. 23:26:01 Will legit pay someone some money to make an open source Moneropoly. 23:26:24 And then we can get all crazy and make a website deployment where you can play with friends and stuff.