01:21:26 geonic: crazy! 01:21:38 Note that Saturday is special 01:21:49 Community meeting at 16:30 UTC 01:21:56 Coffee Chat at 18 UTC 01:22:01 Two events on the same day 01:22:07 We're trying it out 04:19:11 ICYMI. Revuo Issue 43 (Jan 10-17 2020) - https://revuo-monero.com/issue-43.html 04:19:42 sgp_: looking forward to tomorrow's eventful agenda. 06:49:14 made my first CCS proposal! https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/merge_requests/117 13:58:39 lza_menace: that looks good! :- ) I've only a question: why python? 13:59:59 Iza_menace looks promising. You should add the XMR amounts and milestones to this... 14:02:36 I won’t be here for the meeting today, but I am hoping Thunderosa or Almutasim can sit in for us. A quick update on the LochaMesh thing- they’ve updated their CCS proposal and I think it’s much more reasonable at this point: https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/merge_requests/115 16:17:17 Meeting in ~15 minutes 16:30:19 Meeting time everyone 16:30:27 0. Introduction 16:30:32 We would like to welcome everyone to this Monero Community Workgroup Meeting! 16:30:37 Link to agenda on GitHub: https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/428 16:30:42 Monero Community meetings are a discussion place for anything going on in the Monero Community, including other Monero workgroups. We use meetings to encourage the community to share ideas and provide support. 16:30:47 1. Greetings 16:31:03 Ciao 16:31:04 Hi. 16:31:10 Hello 16:31:12 Hi 16:31:15 hi 16:31:44 ping rehrar 16:31:48 welcome everyone 16:31:57 thanks for showing up 30 minutes earlier than usual :) 16:32:00 hi 16:32:18 2. Community highlights 16:32:24 See Monero weekly highlights at https://revuo-monero.com 16:32:26 Present. 16:32:31 A new edition was just out yesterday I believe 16:32:43 The community planning for the Konferenco has been underway. Updates on that later. 16:32:49 Does anyone have community (non-workgroup) updates to share? 16:34:05 apparently not :) 16:34:10 3. CCS updates 16:34:16 Funding required: 16:34:22 3 months part time work on Getmonero.org https://ccs.getmonero.org/proposals/ErCiccione-website-jan-march.html (92.42 / 174 XMR) 16:34:35 Ideas (to be discussed): 16:34:42 Locha Mesh, private transactions and sync over a resilient long-range radio mesh network https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/merge_requests/115 16:34:59 We're switching to Fridays. 16:36:14 there were some concerns about the cost and project management (clear project milestrones) on this one 16:36:18 * binaryFate lurking 16:36:44 the total amount was reduced to 150 xmr 16:36:45 hola 16:36:54 any other comments? thanks to everyone who left comments on gitlab 16:37:07 yikes, is there any more technical details on what they plan to do? 16:37:30 vtnerd: I am not sure, but I recommend asking on gitlab since they have been responsive so far 16:37:50 do they plan to post an updated proposal soon? 16:37:54 * needmonero90 lurks while sleeping 16:38:01 binaryFate: they already updated the amount 16:38:23 ah crud yeah they have a link. I can't respond now because this is the first I've paid attention to it. My primary concern would be the in the routing code, its not trivial for this type of thing 16:38:28 most comments were strongly suggesting to be more specific on milestones 16:38:35 they focused a bit more on the goals and roadmap 16:38:40 https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/merge_requests/115/diffs?commit_id=1031a2e444255e5fa8138601ef746e8b37900a18 16:39:33 hmm its very much a wip I think 16:40:05 my only comment is that this has more risk than the usual CCS for monero feature 16:40:37 agree. On the other hand this will have visibility beyond Monero circles. 16:40:48 thanks vtnerd, please ask specific questions on gitlab too so that the proposal can get better 16:41:09 I haven't had time to look at the proposal after mu last comment, but i see that one of the milestones is about getting the localization workgroup translate their docs 16:41:13 that's very unlikely to happen 16:41:29 yes, if it works ... very awesome 16:42:03 i don't really think we have the resources for that, we already struggle for our own stuff 16:42:37 what would it mean to take this on as Monero Project project? 16:43:18 rehrar: have they given any indication they have any interest in that? 16:43:33 If they haven't, then I wouldn't really be for funding this. 16:43:49 explain please 16:44:10 The tech sounds awesome but I'd be interested in practical limitation estimated like time to broadcast a transaction and range 16:44:45 explain? hmmm... 16:44:46 although the name is not even in esperanto 16:45:16 Well, I can see how developing this tech might be good somewhat, but it's kind of general in its application (not really Monero-only focused) as I understand. 16:45:44 and if it's something that can benefit a lot of other projects, Monero is fronting a good amount of the bill instead of others. 16:46:11 So a way to offset this cost is to have it be a Monero Project project. Similar to OpenAlias. It benefits others if they want it, but it's distinctly "From Monero people" 16:46:14 rehrar: : I think requiring that the CCS only gives $$$ to "Monero Project" projects is far too restrictive and is really a new precedent, so I'm curious if you're focused on that part or the main nature of the project's goal (Monero-focued or elsewhere with Monero as a feature) 16:46:19 the marketing aspect of that offset the cost of its creation. 16:47:05 Bandwidth is my question 16:47:13 my recommendation then is to ask if they want to do that, but I would personally understand if they don't want to 16:47:52 I am against the proposal from a sustainability perspective. Funding a development *team* is not the goal imo, I think we should strive for funding key people for projects that already have a decentralized/communal ethos. If they can't get developers without paying them, we won't be able to bootstrap the system to work without money greasing the wheels constantly 16:48:08 I've been trying to find a way to express the value of 'coordinators' in the ecosystem that are always available to manage/direct/help their particular corner, so that the people working on the actual open source part have low friction 16:48:20 And that kind of position carries with it an expectation of availability 16:48:51 So paying for that particular position, once it emerges, is warranted, but not a full team 16:49:53 The MRL is a good example, they're pretty much always available to talk about stuff, which is a big deal. They buffer ideas and conversations for the actually decentralized research team 16:50:04 Who has no expectation of availability 16:50:16 in this case "a full team" is 2 people I believe 16:51:36 maybe an element of availability and/or dedication to reddit posts and updates would help? 16:52:14 I mean, the issue is more about being available (for a decentralized project) 16:52:38 we've spent a good amount of time on this topic, so let's only give it another minute or two 16:52:45 * needmonero90 nods 16:53:49 Seeing their interactions on twitter, they are getting *a lot* of praise from bitcoin/grin/cypherpunk larger crypto space. 16:54:03 In their own answers I did not see Monero mentioned a single time. 16:54:31 So on the plus side I see a lot of potential visible PR for Monero in return for contributing, on the minus side I fear lack of Monero-specific dedication from the project team 16:54:49 looks like marketing is an important part to focus on more 16:55:21 binaryFate ^ 16:55:21 without overstepping into the whole thing, I think it's appropriate to expect some recognition 16:55:51 i think if the proposal get approved, we should require recognition 16:55:51 any final comments? 16:56:08 like put it clearly in the website and everywhere else that part of the development is funded by Monero 16:56:39 That is reasonable 16:56:58 if we make it more explicit on either part that this project is also about marketing for Monero, then the proposal has more value as we don't just look at the neaty greaty technicals 16:57:05 cool, moving on 16:57:12 v1docq47: video creation / translations into russian (february - july 2020) https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/merge_requests/116 16:57:29 in my personal opinion, this is a great proposal. I'm blown away by the amount of work they do 16:58:06 and they recently made a Trello board so we can more easily see what they are working on 16:58:11 I appreciate that a lot 16:58:18 also, given grin/btc transactions are much smaller, their tech would work better with those coins 16:58:34 yeah, they are also very responsive to reviews and they contact me privately sometimes to have clarifications on the localization process. It's a +1 from me 16:58:52 cool, any other comments? 16:59:35 A Monero-centric Merchant Marketplace https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/merge_requests/117 17:00:38 I don't personally have any comments here yet 17:00:56 Ten hours. Quite new. Let's get them to hop on this channel to answer some questions. 17:01:11 yeah, also Reddit, etc 17:01:54 we can proceed then 17:02:00 4. Workgroup report 17:02:05 a. Localization workgroup 17:02:09 ErCiccione[m]: any update? 17:02:43 Not really. Soon i will make a general refresh of the strings in gui and cli 17:02:59 so that translators can work on the new merged stuff 17:03:05 i just want to note 17:03:30 that there are many suggested strings on weblate (translate.getmonero.org), but no reviewers to take a look at them, 17:03:54 so, after the refresh, i will make a call for translators and i ask the community at large to spread it as much as possible, because there is a lot to do 17:04:44 i will probably refresh the CLI first, because the GUI folks are changing a lot of strings and i want to wait for them to be finished first 17:04:52 that's it 17:04:56 Sounds great. 17:05:11 ErCiccione[m]: you can ping me too for translations 17:05:16 thanks ErCiccione[m] 17:05:29 b. GUI workgroup 17:05:35 There was a point release. Binaries are not out yet. https://github.com/monero-project/monero-gui/releases/tag/v0.15.0.3 17:05:39 c. Outreach workgroup 17:05:44 netrik182: Great to hear that. Keep an eye on #monero-translations :) 17:05:44 almutasim: can you give an update? 17:06:53 Sure. We put out a piece on Chinese perspective. We have a piece ready to go on RPC-Pay. But it is waiting on an infrastructure upgrade. 17:07:06 sgp: there's currently much effort being made to update server backends 17:07:21 We also have a piece started on paper wallets 17:07:41 About RPC-pay, would be great to have a moneropedia entry for that on getmonero.org 17:07:44 https://www.monerooutreach.org/monero-china-west.php 17:07:47 or a dev guide 17:08:09 That’s a good idea. 17:08:14 basically, should be on the website one way or another 17:08:30 100% 17:08:34 Right 17:09:00 It is really neat. We have been testing it with our servers. 17:10:17 I look forward to seeing your system where people can get paid, where you effectively serve as a mining pool for RPC-pay 17:10:22 any other updates? 17:10:31 we are working with endogenic on a nice document he has on Wallet auditing. 17:10:40 That is about it. 17:10:44 nice 17:11:00 d. Hardware workgroup 17:11:10 we can come back to this is msvb-lab is present 17:11:19 e. Konferenco workgroup 17:11:24 lots of work has been ongoing here 17:11:32 weekly meetings on Wednesdays at this point 17:11:45 tentative date June 13-14 17:11:56 we have a tentative location, but there are many outstanding questions 17:12:02 it will be in Berlin 17:12:19 any really quick konferenco questions? you can help out in #monero-konferenco 17:12:32 events will be livestreamed as always 17:13:00 ok, moving on then 17:13:04 f. Monero Research Lab 17:13:08 Hey there 17:13:10 sarang: can you give a brief update please? 17:13:13 :) 17:13:25 Sure 17:13:39 Over the past couple of weeks or so, the Triptych preprint was posted and got some good coverage 17:13:46 It's undergone some updates as well 17:13:58 That's a linkable ring signature construction that scales well 17:14:15 sgp_ and I worked up a blag post on supply auditing that will appear soon 17:14:35 I worked up some material on hidden timelocks, which could be useful but need more analysis 17:15:04 tldr hidden timelocks? 17:15:06 I am still waiting on any final review notes from suraeNoether on the CLSAG overhaul 17:15:33 binaryFate: it's possible to replace "plaintext" timelocks with commitments and clever range proofs 17:15:53 So you can show that the timelock for an (unknown) input has passed without revealing it 17:15:58 to avoid standing out? 17:16:04 Yep 17:16:10 gotcha 17:16:18 It was designed for DLSAG, but also has more general applicability 17:16:51 That sounds awesome. 17:16:54 And the new CLSAG security model is being ported to DLSAG as well, along with some key aggregation math 17:16:54 Math wizards 17:16:55 That sounds awesome. 17:17:26 It remains to be seen if the increase in tx size would justify hidden timelocks 17:17:37 re auditability, I need help making a better auditability image still, so let me know if you have ideas https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/monero-site/merge_requests/1207 17:18:04 I probably won't be able to personally work on this until Sunday or Monday 17:18:55 g. Website workgroup 17:19:04 ErCiccione: can we have another round of updates please? :) 17:19:18 gladly 17:19:21 so, 17:19:44 The wallet auditing document is related to that. A draft should go up on TAIGA tomorrow. 17:19:57 A lot is going on. We have a lot of pull requests ready to go and they should be merged at the beginning of next week 17:20:44 right now i'm focusing mostly on getting the website (at least the 'core' part of it) on Weblate, because right now making any change, means that that change needs to be ported to all languages 17:21:19 that results in a lot of time spent for that, which is very annoying for everybody and suck a lot of time that could be used for something more productive. 17:22:11 I'm running tests and Weblate seems to be reacting nicely, even if YAML files can be a bit troublesome and may happen that stuff don't get parsed 17:22:48 to avoid that i'm making extensive tests on my personal version, which is a copy of the instance hosted on translate.getmonero.org 17:22:58 That makes a lot of sense. I honestly don’t know how you handle the current situation. 17:23:13 almutasim: a lot of swearing 17:23:30 Ha! 17:23:36 ;) 17:23:58 but yeah it's extremely annoying, especially now that we are updating a lot of stuff and all languages need to be up to date 17:24:57 cool, thanks for your sacrifice 17:24:58 so, that's the priority for me at the moment. After that i will try to put other parts of the website on weblate (footers and others), which structure make much harder for weblate to parse them and could require some substantial changes to the structure of those documents 17:25:31 :P 17:25:48 beside that, next will be the roadmap and the FAQ section 17:26:03 ah 17:26:26 the onion mirror should be up at the end of this month according to pony 17:26:33 oooh fancy 17:26:55 Yeah, everything is ready and some prep PR already got merged 17:27:22 if people are interested in the development of the website, please join #monero-site and visit repo.getmonero.org 17:27:38 reviews of Pull requests and issues are very welcome 17:28:19 I love the website workgroup since it's something anyone, regardless of skill, can help with. there are so many different things to do and an unlimited amount of necessary work 17:28:35 thanks ErCiccione 17:28:56 5. Open ideas time 17:29:00 And with so much impact! 17:29:05 I'm going to extend the meeting 10 minutes to fit open ideas time in here 17:29:13 It’s open ideas time! Feel free to propose your ideas to this discussion group, and feel free to comment on others’ ideas. If you disagree with the idea, please reply with constructive criticism. Thank you! 17:29:16 absolutely sgp_. I will try to improve our docs to make easier for newcomers to contribute 17:29:53 totes missed it but caught up already. 17:29:57 I think we should talk about /r/moneromining folks, it's annoying i know, but it's a discussion that must happen 17:30:06 for reference: https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/monero-site/merge_requests/1195 17:30:10 ErCiccione: indeed, this is going to be a long discussion though 17:30:25 i am with needmonero90 on opposing Locha Mesh for XMR. 17:30:33 yeah i understand sgp_. 17:30:37 speaking from experience, nobody uses locha mesh in venezuela. nobody. 17:30:50 Right now we are removing the mention from getmonero, but we should do more 17:31:11 background context: lead mod is acting rash and making racist statements, calling other people who disagree "snowflakes." Basically using the subreddit for their own purposes rather than for Monero mining 17:31:47 I still need to reach out to my Reddit contacts, can do that today after the coffee chat 17:31:56 but they probably won't do anything 17:32:22 they wouldn't de-mod him for putting that kind of stuff in the description? 17:32:23 needmonero90 is sitting on a backup subreddit we can switch to with a good amount of effort 17:32:34 asymptotically: not really, Reddit is weird like that 17:32:38 i think the idea of the migration to /r/monerominer or whatever was called, is the only option we have left 17:33:01 ErCiccione: yes, I think we shoudl prepare to transition to that 17:33:57 maybe we should set aside specific discussion time 17:34:08 to plan the transition 17:34:44 Yeah, we should. 17:34:53 I made the "A Monero-centric Merchant Marketplace" MR - I'm usually not available during these community meeting time blocks. Long form discussion in Gitlab/Reddit would be better 17:35:10 ErCiccione: can you and needmonero90 please coordinate a time and invite others as needed? 17:35:20 Sure. 17:35:22 lza_menace: cool, please share on Reddit too 17:35:28 maybe a dedicated meeting or something. I know binaryfate wants to talk about the fact that the chats are getting a bit bad lately, we could include that discussion as well 17:35:29 will help kick off discussion 17:35:40 Sure thing 17:35:49 sgp_: :thumbsup: - will do - yall have a great weekend 17:36:02 " the chats are getting a bit bad lately, we could include that discussion as well" what chats? 17:36:16 #monero-markets and #monero-pools going off-topic i think 17:36:21 ah, got it 17:36:22 ah yes. The channels. -pools, -markes and even sometimes #monero 17:36:34 definitely a related item 17:36:50 you all are welcome to use this channel for discussion. that's what it's for :) 17:37:18 oh I have one thing I wanted to mention during open ideas time 17:37:50 I have a self-hosted Wekan (open-source Trello copy) instance now available. I’m happy to add your project if you are interested. Please message me for details. I’ve found it more useful than Taiga for many project management needs. 17:38:15 Here’s an example for the Konferenco: https://monero.sandcats.io/shared/f6usdnbIFv3mGp09hTFRkEbz38CHn2KHyM04V-Nhmp- 17:39:21 anyone else have an open ideas topic? we're nearly out of time 17:40:42 6. Confirm next meeting date/time 17:40:47 The next community meeting will be in 2 weeks on 1 February at 17:00 UTC. 17:40:52 A Coffee Chat begins shortly after this meeting: https://youtu.be/YqMcz3XOS6M 17:41:08 please PM me ASAP if you can participate. I'll distribute Jitsi links right away 17:41:13 The following Coffee Chat is on Saturday 8 February at 17:00 UTC. 17:41:19 7. Conclusion 17:41:24 That’s all! Thanks for attending this Monero Community meeting, and we hope to see you on r/MoneroCommunity and #monero-community. Take care, and know that change starts with YOU. 17:41:45 Thanks! 17:43:34 Thanks for hosting sgp_ 17:44:41 thanks sgp_ and everyone 17:45:16 lal 17:46:14 SerHack: it's just what I know :) 17:47:24 i don't have a programming background, more sysadmin. I know scripting languages mostly, learning golang, but wouldn't feel comfortable making something production ready with it 17:55:33 plus it's easy to build web apps with 18:06:47 Atomic swaps xmr<->btc will be awesome for xmr holders - and a potential nightmare for btc holders 18:07:01 elaborate. 18:07:16 why'd it be a nightmare for btc holders exactly? 18:08:29 Who in their right mind would atomic swap xmr to btc at all? 18:08:41 given that it very well might be "blacklisted" btc 18:09:18 because btc is way more broadly accepted everywhere? 18:09:37 going from fungible to non-fungible is not really a good idea :P 18:09:49 I, for one, am not going to play that gambling game. 18:09:53 I prefer blackjack. 18:09:56 :) 19:23:01 I really enjoyed the coffee chat today 19:23:08 How could it have been better? 19:28:26 it takes some time to go from formal to actual discussion/organic chatter 19:30:04 yeah, I tried to simplify that by dropping 4 topics at once. was that good or was it too confusing? 19:31:55 it makes it harder to drop in and out 19:38:46 needmonero90: more punishable when you step away for a sec? 19:38:50 Is that what you mean? 19:38:59 punishing* 19:39:25 Yes that word 19:41:01 How would you do it? 19:44:47 glad it went well. 23:21:30 https://yro.slashdot.org/story/20/01/18/2129220/facial-recognition-database-with-3-billion-scraped-images-might-end-privacy-as-we-know-it